Fix: quotation mark style at line 94

arxiv-style/main.tex

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Despite these advances, most existing work either focuses on packet-level genera
 % 2. Related Work
 \section{Related Work}
 \label{sec:related}
-Early generation of network data oriented towards ``realism'' mostly remained at the packet/flow header level, either through replay or statistical synthesis based on single-point observations. Swing, in a closed-loop, network-responsive manner, extracts user/application/network distributions from single-point observations to reproduce burstiness and correlation across multiple time scales \citep{10.1145/1151659.1159928,10.1145/1159913.1159928}. Subsequently, a series of works advanced header synthesis to learning-based generation: the WGAN-based method added explicit verification of protocol field consistency to NetFlow/IPFIX \citep{Ring_2019}, NetShare reconstructed header modeling as flow-level time series and improved fidelity and scalability through domain encoding and parallel fine-tuning \citep{10.1145/3544216.3544251}, and DoppelGANger preserved the long-range structure and downstream sorting consistency of networked time series by decoupling attributes from sequences \citep{Lin_2020}. However, in industrial control system (ICS) scenarios, the original PCAP is usually not shareable, and public testbeds (such as SWaT, WADI) mostly provide process/monitoring telemetry and protocol interactions for security assessment, but public datasets emphasize operational variables rather than packet-level traces \citep{7469060,10.1145/3055366.3055375}. This makes ``synthesis at the feature/telemetry level, aware of protocol and semantics'' more feasible and necessary in practice: we are more concerned with reproducing high-level distributions and multi-scale temporal patterns according to operational semantics and physical constraints without relying on the original packets. From this perspective, the generation paradigm naturally shifts from ``packet syntax reproduction'' to ``modeling of high-level spatio-temporal distributions and uncertainties'', requiring stable training, strong distribution fitting, and interpretable uncertainty characterization.
+Early generation of network data oriented towards "realism" mostly remained at the packet/flow header level, either through replay or statistical synthesis based on single-point observations. Swing, in a closed-loop, network-responsive manner, extracts user/application/network distributions from single-point observations to reproduce burstiness and correlation across multiple time scales \citep{10.1145/1151659.1159928,10.1145/1159913.1159928}. Subsequently, a series of works advanced header synthesis to learning-based generation: the WGAN-based method added explicit verification of protocol field consistency to NetFlow/IPFIX \citep{Ring_2019}, NetShare reconstructed header modeling as flow-level time series and improved fidelity and scalability through domain encoding and parallel fine-tuning \citep{10.1145/3544216.3544251}, and DoppelGANger preserved the long-range structure and downstream sorting consistency of networked time series by decoupling attributes from sequences \citep{Lin_2020}. However, in industrial control system (ICS) scenarios, the original PCAP is usually not shareable, and public testbeds (such as SWaT, WADI) mostly provide process/monitoring telemetry and protocol interactions for security assessment, but public datasets emphasize operational variables rather than packet-level traces \citep{7469060,10.1145/3055366.3055375}. This makes ``synthesis at the feature/telemetry level, aware of protocol and semantics'' more feasible and necessary in practice: we are more concerned with reproducing high-level distributions and multi-scale temporal patterns according to operational semantics and physical constraints without relying on the original packets. From this perspective, the generation paradigm naturally shifts from ``packet syntax reproduction'' to ``modeling of high-level spatio-temporal distributions and uncertainties'', requiring stable training, strong distribution fitting, and interpretable uncertainty characterization.
 
 Diffusion models exhibit good fit along this path: DDPM achieves high-quality sampling and stable optimization through efficient $\epsilon$ parameterization and weighted variational objectives \citep{NEURIPS2020_4c5bcfec}, the SDE perspective unifies score-based and diffusion, providing likelihood evaluation and prediction-correction sampling strategies based on probability flow ODEs \citep{song2021scorebasedgenerativemodelingstochastic}. For time series, TimeGrad replaces the constrained output distribution with conditional denoising, capturing high-dimensional correlations at each step \citep{rasul2021autoregressivedenoisingdiffusionmodels}; CSDI explicitly performs conditional diffusion and uses two-dimensional attention to simultaneously leverage temporal and cross-feature dependencies, suitable for conditioning and filling in missing values \citep{tashiro2021csdiconditionalscorebaseddiffusion}; in a more general spatio-temporal structure, DiffSTG generalizes diffusion to spatio-temporal graphs, combining TCN/GCN with denoising U-Net to improve CRPS and inference efficiency in a non-autoregressive manner \citep{wen2024diffstgprobabilisticspatiotemporalgraph}, and PriSTI further enhances conditional features and geographical relationships, maintaining robustness under high missing rates and sensor failures \citep{liu2023pristiconditionaldiffusionframework}; in long sequences and continuous domains, DiffWave verifies that diffusion can also match the quality of strong vocoders under non-autoregressive fast synthesis \citep{kong2021diffwaveversatilediffusionmodel}; studies on cellular communication traffic show that diffusion can recover spatio-temporal patterns and provide uncertainty characterization at the urban scale \citep{11087622}. These results overall point to a conclusion: when the research focus is on ``telemetry/high-level features'' rather than raw messages, diffusion models provide stable and fine-grained distribution fitting and uncertainty quantification, which is exactly in line with the requirements of ICS telemetry synthesis. Meanwhile, directly entrusting all structures to a ``monolithic diffusion'' is not advisable: long-range temporal skeletons and fine-grained marginal distributions often have optimization tensions, requiring explicit decoupling in modeling.