forked from manbo/internal-docs
421 lines
60 KiB
TeX
421 lines
60 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{article}
|
||
|
||
\usepackage{arxiv}
|
||
|
||
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % allow utf-8 input
|
||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % use 8-bit T1 fonts
|
||
\usepackage{hyperref} % hyperlinks
|
||
\usepackage{url} % simple URL typesetting
|
||
\usepackage{booktabs} % professional-quality tables
|
||
\usepackage{amsfonts} % blackboard math symbols
|
||
\usepackage{nicefrac} % compact symbols for 1/2, etc.
|
||
\usepackage{microtype} % microtypography
|
||
\usepackage{amsmath} % cleveref must be loaded after amsmath!
|
||
\usepackage{cleveref} % smart cross-referencing
|
||
\usepackage{lipsum} % Can be removed after putting your text content
|
||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||
\usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
|
||
\usepackage{doi}
|
||
|
||
% Packages for equations
|
||
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
||
\usepackage{bm}
|
||
\usepackage{array} % For column formatting
|
||
\usepackage{caption} % Better caption spacing
|
||
|
||
% 标题
|
||
\title{Mask-DDPM: Transformer-Conditioned Mixed-Type Diffusion for Semantically Valid ICS Telemetry Synthesis}
|
||
|
||
% 若不需要日期，取消下面一行的注释
|
||
\date{}
|
||
|
||
\newif\ifuniqueAffiliation
|
||
\uniqueAffiliationtrue
|
||
|
||
\ifuniqueAffiliation % 标准作者块
|
||
\author{
|
||
Zhenglan Chen \\
|
||
Aberdeen Institute of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence\\
|
||
South China Normal University\\
|
||
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, China \\
|
||
\texttt{20223803054@m.scnu.edu.cn} \\
|
||
\And
|
||
Mingzhe Yang \\
|
||
Aberdeen Institute of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence\\
|
||
South China Normal University\\
|
||
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, China \\
|
||
\texttt{20223803063@m.scnu.edu.cn} \\
|
||
\And
|
||
Hongyu Yan \\
|
||
Aberdeen Institute of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence\\
|
||
South China Normal University\\
|
||
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, China \\
|
||
\texttt{20223803065@m.scnu.edu.cn}
|
||
\And
|
||
Huan Yang \\
|
||
foo\\
|
||
South China Normal University\\
|
||
Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, China \\
|
||
\texttt{foo@bar.com} \\
|
||
}
|
||
\fi
|
||
|
||
% 页眉设置
|
||
\renewcommand{\shorttitle}{\textit{arXiv} Template}
|
||
|
||
%%% PDF 元数据
|
||
\hypersetup{
|
||
pdftitle={Your Paper Title},
|
||
pdfsubject={cs.LG, cs.CR},
|
||
pdfauthor={David S.~Hippocampus, Elias D.~Striatum},
|
||
pdfkeywords={Keyword1, Keyword2, Keyword3},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
\begin{document}
|
||
\maketitle
|
||
|
||
\begin{abstract}
|
||
Industrial control systems (ICS) security research is increasingly constrained by the scarcity and non-shareability of realistic traffic and telemetry, especially for attack scenarios. To mitigate this bottleneck, we study synthetic generation at the protocol feature/telemetry level, where samples must simultaneously preserve temporal coherence, match continuous marginal distributions, and keep discrete supervisory variables strictly within valid vocabularies. We propose Mask-DDPM, a hybrid framework tailored to mixed-type, multi-scale ICS sequences. Mask-DDPM factorizes generation into (i) a causal Transformer trend module that rolls out a stable long-horizon temporal scaffold for continuous channels, (ii) a trend-conditioned residual DDPM that refines local stochastic structure and heavy-tailed fluctuations without degrading global dynamics, (iii) a masked (absorbing) diffusion branch for discrete variables that guarantees categorical legality by construction, and (iv) a type-aware decomposition/routing layer that aligns modeling mechanisms with heterogeneous ICS variable origins and enforces deterministic reconstruction where appropriate. Evaluated on fixed-length windows (L=96) derived from the HAI Security Dataset, Mask-DDPM achieves stable fidelity across seeds with mean KS = 0.3311 ± 0.0079 (continuous), mean JSD = 0.0284 ± 0.0073 (discrete), and mean absolute lag-1 autocorrelation difference = 0.2684 ± 0.0027, indicating faithful marginals, preserved short-horizon dynamics, and valid discrete semantics. The resulting generator provides a reproducible basis for data augmentation, benchmarking, and downstream ICS protocol reconstruction workflows.
|
||
\end{abstract}
|
||
|
||
% 关键词
|
||
\keywords{Machine Learning \and Cyber Defense \and ICS}
|
||
|
||
% 1. Introduction
|
||
\section{Introduction}
|
||
\label{sec:intro}
|
||
Industrial control systems (ICS) form the backbone of modern critical infrastructure, which includes power grids, water treatment, manufacturing, and transportation, among others. These systems monitor, regulate, and automate the physical processes through sensors, actuators, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), and monitoring software. Unlike conventional IT systems, ICS operate in real time, closely coupled with physical processes and safety‑critical constraints, using heterogeneous and legacy communication protocols such as Modbus/TCP and DNP3 that were not originally designed with robust security in mind. This architectural complexity and operational criticality make ICS high‑impact targets for cyber attacks, where disruptions can result in physical damage, environmental harm, and even loss of life. Recent reviews of ICS security highlight the expanding attack surface due to increased connectivity, legacy systems’ vulnerabilities, and the inadequacy of traditional security controls in capturing the nuances of ICS networks and protocols \citep{10.1007/s10844-022-00753-1, Nankya2023-gp}
|
||
|
||
While machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise for anomaly detection and automated cybersecurity within ICS, they rely heavily on labeled datasets that capture both benign operations and diverse attack patterns. In practice, real ICS traffic data, especially attack‑triggered captures, are scarce due to confidentiality, safety, and legal restrictions, and available public ICS datasets are few, limited in scope, or fail to reflect current threat modalities. For instance, the HAI Security Dataset provides operational telemetry and anomaly flags from a realistic control system setup for research purposes, but must be carefully preprocessed to derive protocol‑relevant features for ML tasks \citep{shin}. Data scarcity directly undermines model generalization, evaluation reproducibility, and the robustness of intrusion detection research, especially when training or testing ML models on realistic ICS behavior remains confined to small or outdated collections of examples \citep{info16100910}.
|
||
|
||
Synthetic data generation offers a practical pathway to mitigate these challenges. By programmatically generating feature‑level sequences that mimic the statistical and temporal structure of real ICS telemetry, researchers can augment scarce training sets, standardize benchmarking, and preserve operational confidentiality. Relative to raw packet captures, feature‑level synthesis abstracts critical protocol semantics and statistical patterns without exposing sensitive fields, making it more compatible with safety constraints and compliance requirements in ICS environments. Modern generative modeling, including diffusion models, has advanced significantly in producing high‑fidelity synthetic data across domains. Diffusion approaches, such as denoising diffusion probabilistic models, learn to transform noise into coherent structured samples and have been successfully applied to tabular or time series data synthesis with better stability and data coverage compared to adversarial methods \citep{pmlr-v202-kotelnikov23a, rasul2021autoregressivedenoisingdiffusionmodels}
|
||
|
||
Despite these advances, most existing work either focuses on packet‑level generation \citep{jiang2023netdiffusionnetworkdataaugmentation} or is limited to generic tabular data \citep{pmlr-v202-kotelnikov23a}, rather than domain‑specific control sequence synthesis tailored for ICS protocols where temporal coherence, multi‑channel dependencies, and discrete protocol legality are jointly required. This gap motivates our focus on protocol feature-level generation for ICS, which involves synthesizing sequences of protocol-relevant fields conditioned on their temporal and cross-channel structure. In this work, we formulate a hybrid modeling pipeline that decouples long‑horizon trends and local statistical detail while preserving discrete semantics of protocol tokens. By combining causal Transformers with diffusion‑based refiners, and enforcing deterministic validity constraints during sampling, our framework generates semantically coherent, temporally consistent, and distributionally faithful ICS feature sequences. We evaluate features derived from the HAI Security Dataset and demonstrate that our approach produces high‑quality synthetic sequences suitable for downstream augmentation, benchmarking, and integration into packet‑construction workflows that respect realistic ICS constraints.
|
||
|
||
% 2. Related Work
|
||
\section{Related Work}
|
||
\label{sec:related}
|
||
Early generation of network data oriented towards ``realism'' mostly remained at the packet/flow header level, either through replay or statistical synthesis based on single-point observations. Swing, in a closed-loop, network-responsive manner, extracts user/application/network distributions from single-point observations to reproduce burstiness and correlation across multiple time scales \citep{10.1145/1151659.1159928,10.1145/1159913.1159928}. Subsequently, a series of works advanced header synthesis to learning-based generation: the WGAN-based method added explicit verification of protocol field consistency to NetFlow/IPFIX \citep{Ring_2019}, NetShare reconstructed header modeling as flow-level time series and improved fidelity and scalability through domain encoding and parallel fine-tuning \citep{10.1145/3544216.3544251}, and DoppelGANger preserved the long-range structure and downstream sorting consistency of networked time series by decoupling attributes from sequences \citep{Lin_2020}. However, in industrial control system (ICS) scenarios, the original PCAP is usually not shareable, and public testbeds (such as SWaT, WADI) mostly provide process/monitoring telemetry and protocol interactions for security assessment, but public datasets emphasize operational variables rather than packet-level traces \citep{7469060,10.1145/3055366.3055375}. This makes ``synthesis at the feature/telemetry level, aware of protocol and semantics'' more feasible and necessary in practice: we are more concerned with reproducing high-level distributions and multi-scale temporal patterns according to operational semantics and physical constraints without relying on the original packets. From this perspective, the generation paradigm naturally shifts from ``packet syntax reproduction'' to ``modeling of high-level spatio-temporal distributions and uncertainties'', requiring stable training, strong distribution fitting, and interpretable uncertainty characterization.
|
||
|
||
Diffusion models exhibit good fit along this path: DDPM achieves high-quality sampling and stable optimization through efficient $\epsilon$ parameterization and weighted variational objectives \citep{NEURIPS2020_4c5bcfec}, the SDE perspective unifies score-based and diffusion, providing likelihood evaluation and prediction-correction sampling strategies based on probability flow ODEs \citep{song2021scorebasedgenerativemodelingstochastic}. For time series, TimeGrad replaces the constrained output distribution with conditional denoising, capturing high-dimensional correlations at each step \citep{rasul2021autoregressivedenoisingdiffusionmodels}; CSDI explicitly performs conditional diffusion and uses two-dimensional attention to simultaneously leverage temporal and cross-feature dependencies, suitable for conditioning and filling in missing values \citep{tashiro2021csdiconditionalscorebaseddiffusion}; in a more general spatio-temporal structure, DiffSTG generalizes diffusion to spatio-temporal graphs, combining TCN/GCN with denoising U-Net to improve CRPS and inference efficiency in a non-autoregressive manner \citep{wen2024diffstgprobabilisticspatiotemporalgraph}, and PriSTI further enhances conditional features and geographical relationships, maintaining robustness under high missing rates and sensor failures \citep{liu2023pristiconditionaldiffusionframework}; in long sequences and continuous domains, DiffWave verifies that diffusion can also match the quality of strong vocoders under non-autoregressive fast synthesis \citep{kong2021diffwaveversatilediffusionmodel}; studies on cellular communication traffic show that diffusion can recover spatio-temporal patterns and provide uncertainty characterization at the urban scale \citep{11087622}. These results overall point to a conclusion: when the research focus is on ``telemetry/high-level features'' rather than raw messages, diffusion models provide stable and fine-grained distribution fitting and uncertainty quantification, which is exactly in line with the requirements of ICS telemetry synthesis. Meanwhile, directly entrusting all structures to a ``monolithic diffusion'' is not advisable: long-range temporal skeletons and fine-grained marginal distributions often have optimization tensions, requiring explicit decoupling in modeling.
|
||
|
||
Looking further into the mechanism complexity of ICS: its channel types are inherently mixed, containing both continuous process trajectories and discrete supervision/status variables, and discrete channels must be ``legal'' under operational constraints. The aforementioned progress in time series diffusion has mainly occurred in continuous spaces, but discrete diffusion has also developed systematic methods: D3PM improves sampling quality and likelihood through absorption/masking and structured transitions in discrete state spaces \citep{austin2023structureddenoisingdiffusionmodels}, subsequent masked diffusion provides stable reconstruction on categorical data in a more simplified form \citep{Lin_2020}, multinomial diffusion directly defines diffusion on a finite vocabulary through mechanisms such as argmax flows \citep{hoogeboom2021argmaxflowsmultinomialdiffusion}, and Diffusion-LM demonstrates an effective path for controllable text generation by imposing gradient constraints in continuous latent spaces \citep{li2022diffusionlmimprovescontrollabletext}. From the perspectives of protocols and finite-state machines, coverage-guided fuzz testing emphasizes the criticality of ``sequence legality and state coverage'' \citep{meng2025aflnetyearslatercoverageguided,godefroid2017learnfuzzmachinelearninginput,she2019neuzzefficientfuzzingneural}, echoing the concept of ``legality by construction'' in discrete diffusion: preferentially adopting absorption/masking diffusion on discrete channels, supplemented by type-aware conditioning and sampling constraints, to avoid semantic invalidity and marginal distortion caused by post hoc thresholding.
|
||
|
||
From the perspective of high-level synthesis, the temporal structure is equally indispensable: ICS control often involves delay effects, phased operating conditions, and cross-channel coupling, requiring models to be able to characterize low-frequency, long-range dependencies while also overlaying multi-modal fine-grained fluctuations on them. The Transformer series has provided sufficient evidence in long-sequence time series tasks: Transformer-XL breaks through the fixed-length context limitation through a reusable memory mechanism and significantly enhances long-range dependency expression \citep{dai2019transformerxlattentivelanguagemodels}; Informer uses ProbSparse attention and efficient decoding to balance span and efficiency in long-sequence prediction \citep{zhou2021informerefficienttransformerlong}; Autoformer robustly models long-term seasonality and trends through autocorrelation and decomposition mechanisms \citep{wu2022autoformerdecompositiontransformersautocorrelation}; FEDformer further improves long-period prediction performance in frequency domain enhancement and decomposition \citep{zhou2022fedformerfrequencyenhanceddecomposed}; PatchTST enhances the stability and generalization of long-sequence multivariate prediction through local patch-based representation and channel-independent modeling \citep{2023}. Combining our previous positioning of diffusion, this chain of evidence points to a natural division of labor: using attention-based sequence models to first extract stable low-frequency trends/conditions (long-range skeletons), and then allowing diffusion to focus on margins and details in the residual space; meanwhile, discrete masking/absorbing diffusion is applied to supervised/pattern variables to ensure vocabulary legality by construction. This design not only inherits the advantages of time series diffusion in distribution fitting and uncertainty characterization \citep{rasul2021autoregressivedenoisingdiffusionmodels,tashiro2021csdiconditionalscorebaseddiffusion,wen2024diffstgprobabilisticspatiotemporalgraph,liu2023pristiconditionaldiffusionframework,kong2021diffwaveversatilediffusionmodel,11087622}, but also stabilizes the macroscopic temporal support through the long-range attention of Transformer, enabling the formation of an operational integrated generation pipeline under the mixed types and multi-scale dynamics of ICS.
|
||
|
||
% 3. Methodology
|
||
\section{Methodology}
|
||
\label{sec:method}
|
||
Industrial control system (ICS) telemetry is intrinsically mixed-type and mechanistically heterogeneous: continuous process trajectories (e.g., sensor and actuator signals) coexist with discrete supervisory states (e.g., modes, alarms, interlocks), and the underlying generating mechanisms range from physical inertia to program-driven step logic. This heterogeneity is not cosmetic—it directly affects what “realistic” synthesis means, because a generator must jointly satisfy (i) temporal coherence, (ii) distributional fidelity, and (iii) discrete semantic validity (i.e., every discrete output must belong to its legal vocabulary by construction). These properties are emphasized broadly in operational-technology security guidance and ICS engineering practice, where state logic and physical dynamics are tightly coupled \citep{nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
We formalize each training instance as a fixed-length window of length We model each training instance as a fixed-length window of length $L$, comprising continuous channels $\bm{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times d_c}$ and discrete channels $\bm{Y} = \{y^{(j)}_{1:L}\}_{j=1}^{d_d}$, where each discrete variable satisfies $y^{(j)}_t \in \mathcal{V}_j$ for a finite vocabulary $\mathcal{V}_j$. Our objective is to learn a generator that produces synthetic $(\hat{\bm{X}}, \hat{\bm{Y}})$ that are simultaneously coherent and distributionally faithful, while also ensuring $\hat{y}^{(j)}_t\in\mathcal{V}_j$ for all $j$, $t$ by construction (rather than via post-hoc rounding or thresholding).
|
||
|
||
A key empirical and methodological tension in ICS synthesis is that temporal realism and marginal/distributional realism can compete when optimized monolithically: sequence models trained primarily for regression often over-smooth heavy tails and intermittent bursts, while purely distribution-matching objectives can erode long-range structure. Diffusion models provide a principled route to rich distribution modeling through iterative denoising, but they do not, by themselves, resolve (i) the need for a stable low-frequency temporal scaffold, nor (ii) the discrete legality constraints for supervisory variables \citep{ho2020denoising,song2021score}. Recent time-series diffusion work further suggests that separating coarse structure from stochastic refinement can be an effective inductive bias for long-horizon realism \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{fig-design-v2.png}
|
||
% \caption{Description of the figure.}
|
||
\label{fig:design}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
Motivated by these considerations, we propose Mask-DDPM, organized in the following order:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Transformer trend module: learns the dominant temporal backbone of continuous dynamics via attention-based sequence modeling \citep{vaswani2017attention}.
|
||
|
||
\item Residual DDPM for continuous variables: models distributional detail as stochastic residual structure conditioned on the learned trend \citep{ho2020denoising,kollovieh2023tsdiff}.
|
||
|
||
\item Masked diffusion for discrete variables: generates discrete ICS states with an absorbing/masking corruption process and categorical reconstruction \citep{austin2021structured, shi2024simplified}.
|
||
|
||
\item Type-aware decomposition: a type-aware factorization and routing layer that assigns variables to the most appropriate modeling mechanism and enforces deterministic constraints where warranted.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
|
||
This ordering is intentional. The trend module establishes a macro-temporal scaffold; residual diffusion then concentrates capacity on micro-structure and marginal fidelity; masked diffusion provides a native mechanism for discrete legality; and the type-aware layer operationalizes the observation that not all ICS variables should be modeled with the same stochastic mechanism. Importantly, while diffusion-based generation for ICS telemetry has begun to emerge, existing approaches remain limited and typically emphasize continuous synthesis or augmentation; in contrast, our pipeline integrates (i) a Transformer-conditioned residual diffusion backbone, (ii) a discrete masked-diffusion branch, and (iii) explicit type-aware routing for heterogeneous variable mechanisms within a single coherent generator \citep{yuan2025ctu,sha2026ddpm}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Transformer trend module for continuous dynamics}
|
||
\label{sec:method-trans}
|
||
We instantiate the temporal backbone as a causal Transformer trend extractor, leveraging self-attention’s ability to represent long-range dependencies and cross-channel interactions without recurrence \citep{vaswani2017attention}. Compared with recurrent trend extractors (e.g., GRU-style backbones), a Transformer trend module offers a direct mechanism to model delayed effects and multivariate coupling—common in ICS, where control actions may influence downstream sensors with nontrivial lags and regime-dependent propagation \citep{vaswani2017attention,nist2023sp80082}. Crucially, in our design the Transformer is not asked to be the entire generator; instead, it serves a deliberately restricted role: providing a stable, temporally coherent conditioning signal that later stochastic components refine.
|
||
|
||
For continuous channels $\bm{X}$, we posit an additive decomposition:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\bm{X} = \bm{S} + \bm{R},
|
||
\label{eq:additive_decomp}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\bm{S} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times d_c}$ is a smooth trend capturing predictable temporal evolution, and $\bm{R} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times d_c}$ is a residual capturing distributional detail (e.g., bursts, heavy tails, local fluctuations) that is difficult to represent robustly with a purely regression-based temporal objective. This separation reflects an explicit division of labor: the trend module prioritizes temporal coherence, while diffusion (introduced next) targets distributional realism at the residual level—a strategy aligned with “predict-then-refine” perspectives in time-series diffusion modeling \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
We parameterize the trend $\bm{S}$ using a causal Transformer $f_\phi$. With teacher forcing, we train $F_\phi$ to predict the next-step trend from past observations:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\hat{\bm{S}}_{t+1} = f_{\phi}(\bm{X}_{1:t}), \quad t = 1, \dots, L-1.
|
||
\label{eq:trend_prediction}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
using the mean-squared error objective:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}_{\text{trend}}(\phi) = \frac{1}{(L-1)d_c} \sum_{t=1}^{L-1} \bigl\| \hat{\bm{S}}_{t+1} - \bm{X}_{t+1} \bigr\|_2^2.
|
||
\label{eq:trend_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
At inference, we roll out the Transformer autoregressively to obtain $\hat{\bm{S}}$, and and then define the residual target for diffusion as $\bm{R} = \bm{X} - \hat{\bm{S}}$. This setup intentionally “locks in” a coherent low-frequency scaffold before any stochastic refinement is applied, thereby reducing the burden on downstream diffusion modules to simultaneously learn both long-range structure and marginal detail. In this sense, our use of Transformers is distinctive: it is a conditioning-first temporal backbone designed to stabilize mixed-type diffusion synthesis in ICS, rather than an end-to-end monolithic generator \citep{vaswani2017attention,kollovieh2023tsdiff,yuan2025ctu}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{DDPM for continuous residual generation}
|
||
\label{sec:method-ddpm}
|
||
We model the residual RRR with a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) conditioned on the trend $\hat{\bm{S}}$ \citep{ho2020denoising}. Diffusion models learn complex data distributions by inverting a tractable noising process through iterative denoising, and have proven effective at capturing multimodality and heavy-tailed structure that is often attenuated by purely regression-based sequence models \citep{ho2020denoising,song2021score}. Conditioning the diffusion model on $\hat{\bm{S}}$ is central: it prevents the denoiser from re-learning the low-frequency scaffold and focuses capacity on residual micro-structure, mirroring the broader principle that diffusion excels as a distributional corrector when a reasonable coarse structure is available \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff, sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
Let $\bm{K}$ denote the number of diffusion steps, with a noise schedule $\{\beta_k\}_{k=1}^K$, $\alpha_k = 1 - \beta_k$, and $\bar{\alpha}_k = \prod_{i=1}^k \alpha_i$. The forward corruption process is:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
q(\bm{r}_k \mid \bm{r}_0) = \mathcal{N}\bigl( \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_k}\,\bm{r}_0,\; (1 - \bar{\alpha}_k)\mathbf{I} \bigr)
|
||
\label{eq:forward_corruption}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
equivalently,
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\bm{r}_k = \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_k}\,\bm{r}_0 + \sqrt{1 - \bar{\alpha}_k}\,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}, \quad \boldsymbol{\epsilon} \sim \mathcal{N}(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{I})
|
||
\label{eq:forward_corruption_eq}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
The learned reverse process is parameterized as:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
p_{\theta}(\bm{r}_{k-1} \mid \bm{r}_k, \hat{\bm{S}}) = \mathcal{N}\bigl( \boldsymbol{\mu}_{\theta}(\bm{r}_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}),\; \boldsymbol{\Sigma}(k) \bigr).
|
||
\label{eq:reverse_process}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\mu_\theta$ is implemented by a Transformer denoiser that consumes (i) the noised residual $r_k$, (ii) a timestep embedding for $k$, and (iii) conditioning features derived from $\hat{\bm{S}}$. This denoiser architecture is consistent with the growing use of attention-based denoisers for long-context time-series diffusion, while our key methodological emphasis is the trend-conditioned residual factorization as the object of diffusion learning \citep{ho2020denoising,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
We train the denoiser using the standard DDPM $\epsilon$-prediction objective:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}_{\text{cont}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_{k,\bm{r}_0,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}} \left[ \bigl\| \boldsymbol{\epsilon} - \boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{\theta}(\bm{r}_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}) \bigr\|_2^2 \right].
|
||
\label{eq:ddpm_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
Because diffusion optimization can exhibit timestep imbalance (i.e., some timesteps dominate gradients), we optionally apply an SNR-based reweighting consistent with Min-SNR training:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}^{\text{snr}}_{\text{cont}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_{k,\bm{r}_0,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}} \left[ w_k \bigl\| \boldsymbol{\epsilon} - \boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{\theta}(\bm{r}_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}) \bigr\|_2^2 \right],
|
||
\label{eq:snr_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\mathrm{SNR}_k=\bar{\alpha}_k/(1-\bar{\alpha}_k)$ and $\gamma>0$ is a cap parameter \citep{hang2023efficient}.
|
||
|
||
After sampling $\hat{\bm{R}}$ by reverse diffusion, we reconstruct the continuous output as $\hat{\bm{X}} = \hat{\bm{S}} + \hat{\bm{R}}$. Overall, the DDPM component serves as a distributional corrector on top of a temporally coherent backbone, which is particularly suited to ICS where low-frequency dynamics are strong and persistent but fine-scale variability (including bursts and regime-conditioned noise) remains important for realism. Relative to prior ICS diffusion efforts that primarily focus on continuous augmentation, our formulation elevates trend-conditioned residual diffusion as a modular mechanism for disentangling temporal structure from distributional refinement \citep{yuan2025ctu,sha2026ddpm}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Masked diffusion for discrete ICS variables}
|
||
\label{sec:method-discrete}
|
||
Discrete ICS variables must remain categorical, making Gaussian diffusion inappropriate for supervisory states and mode-like channels. While one can attempt continuous relaxations or post-hoc discretization, such strategies risk producing semantically invalid intermediate states (e.g., “in-between” modes) and can distort the discrete marginal distribution. Discrete-state diffusion provides a principled alternative by defining a valid corruption process directly on categorical variables \citep{austin2021structured,shi2024simplified}. In the ICS setting, this is not a secondary detail: supervisory tags often encode control logic boundaries (modes, alarms, interlocks) that must remain within a finite vocabulary to preserve semantic correctness \citep{nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
We therefore adopt masked (absorbing) diffusion for discrete channels, where corruption replaces tokens with a special $\texttt{[MASK]}$ symbol according to a schedule \citep{shi2024simplified}. For each variable $j$, define a masking schedule $\{m_k\}_{k=1}^K$ (with $m_k\in[0,1]$) increasing in $k$. The forward corruption process is:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
q(y^{(j)}_k \mid y^{(j)}_0) =
|
||
\begin{cases}
|
||
y^{(j)}_0, & \text{with probability } 1 - m_k, \\
|
||
\texttt{[MASK]}, & \text{with probability } m_k,
|
||
\end{cases}
|
||
\label{eq:masking_process}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
applied independently across $j$ and $t$. Let $\mathcal{M}$ denote the set of masked positions at step $k$. The denoiser $h_{\psi}$ predicts a categorical distribution over $\mathcal{V}_j$ for each masked token, conditioned on (i) the corrupted discrete sequence, (ii) the diffusion step $k$, and (iii) continuous context. Concretely, we condition on $\hat{\bm{S}}$ and $\hat{\bm{X}}$ to couple supervisory reconstruction to the underlying continuous dynamics:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
p_{\psi}\bigl( y^{(j)}_0 \mid y_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}} \bigr) = h_{\psi}(y_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}}).
|
||
\label{eq:discrete_denoising}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
This conditioning choice is motivated by the fact that many discrete ICS states are not standalone, they are functions of regimes, thresholds, and procedural phases that manifest in continuous channels \citep{nist2023sp80082}. Training uses a categorical denoising objective:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}_{\text{disc}}(\psi) = \mathbb{E}_{k} \left[ \frac{1}{|\mathcal{M}|} \sum_{(j,t) \in \mathcal{M}} \mathrm{CE}\bigl( h_{\psi}(y_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}})_{j,t},\; y^{(j)}_{0,t} \bigr) \right],
|
||
\label{eq:discrete_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\mathrm{CE}(\cdot,\cdot)$ is cross-entropy. At sampling time, we initialize all discrete tokens as $\texttt{[MASK]}$ and iteratively unmask them using the learned conditionals, ensuring that every output token lies in its legal vocabulary by construction. This discrete branch is a key differentiator of our pipeline: unlike typical continuous-only diffusion augmentation in ICS, we integrate masked diffusion as a first-class mechanism for supervisory-variable legality within the same end-to-end synthesis workflow \citep{shi2024simplified,yuan2025ctu}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Type-aware decomposition as factorization and routing layer}
|
||
\label{sec:method-types}
|
||
Even with a trend-conditioned residual DDPM and a discrete masked-diffusion branch, a single uniform modeling treatment can remain suboptimal because ICS variables are generated by qualitatively different mechanisms. For example, program-driven setpoints exhibit step-and-dwell dynamics; controller outputs follow control laws conditioned on process feedback; actuator positions may show saturation and dwell; and some “derived tags” are deterministic functions of other channels. Treating all channels as if they were exchangeable stochastic processes can misallocate model capacity and induce systematic error concentration on a small subset of mechanistically distinct variables \citep{nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
We therefore introduce a type-aware decomposition that formalizes this heterogeneity as a routing and constraint layer. Let $\tau(i)\in{1,\dots,6}$ assign each variable (i) to a type class. The type assignment can be initialized from domain semantics (tag metadata, value domains, and engineering meaning), and subsequently refined via an error-attribution workflow described in the Benchmark section. Importantly, this refinement does not change the core diffusion backbone; it changes which mechanism is responsible for which variable, thereby aligning inductive bias with variable-generating mechanism while preserving overall coherence.
|
||
|
||
We use the following taxonomy:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Type 1 (program-driven / setpoint-like): externally commanded, step-and-dwell variables. These variables can be treated as exogenous drivers (conditioning signals) or routed to specialized change-point / dwell-time models, rather than being forced into a smooth denoiser that may over-regularize step structure.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 2 (controller outputs): continuous variables tightly coupled to feedback loops; these benefit from conditional modeling where the conditioning includes relevant process variables and commanded setpoints.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 3 (actuator states/positions): often exhibit saturation, dwell, and rate limits; these may require stateful dynamics beyond generic residual diffusion, motivating either specialized conditional modules or additional inductive constraints.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 4 (process variables): inertia-dominated continuous dynamics; these are the primary beneficiaries of the Transformer trend + residual DDPM pipeline.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 5 (derived/deterministic variables): algebraic or rule-based functions of other variables; we enforce deterministic reconstruction $\hat{x}^{(i)} = g_i(\hat{X},\hat{Y})$ rather than learning a stochastic generator, improving logical consistency and sample efficiency.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 6 (auxiliary/low-impact variables): weakly coupled or sparse signals; we allow simplified modeling (e.g., calibrated marginals or lightweight temporal models) to avoid allocating diffusion capacity where it is not warranted.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig-type-aware-routing-realdata.pdf}
|
||
\caption{Type-aware decomposition as mechanism-aligned routing. The left panel formalizes the assignment $\tau(i)=\mathrm{TypeAssign}(m_i,s_i,d_i)$ from metadata, temporal signature, and dependency pattern. The center panel organizes the resulting six-type taxonomy and embeds representative real HAI telemetry signatures as miniature evidence for each type. The right panel shows how the current implementation uses this taxonomy: Type 1 variables act as explicit conditioning signals together with file-level context, Types 2/3/4/6 share the learned generator, and Type 5 variables are deterministically reconstructed after sampling. The representative insets are selected automatically from the configured type sets and normalized within each inset for qualitative comparison.}
|
||
\label{fig:type-routing-realdata}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
Type-aware decomposition improves synthesis quality through three mechanisms. First, it improves capacity allocation by preventing a small set of mechanistically atypical variables from dominating gradients and distorting the learned distribution for the majority class (typically Type 4). Second, it enables constraint enforcement by deterministically reconstructing Type 5 variables, preventing logically inconsistent samples that purely learned generators can produce. Third, it improves mechanism alignment by attaching inductive biases consistent with step/dwell or saturation behaviors where generic denoisers may implicitly favor smoothness.
|
||
|
||
From a novelty standpoint, this layer is not merely an engineering “patch”; it is an explicit methodological statement that ICS synthesis benefits from typed factorization—a principle that has analogues in mixed-type generative modeling more broadly, but that remains underexplored in diffusion-based ICS telemetry synthesis \citep{shi2025tabdiff,yuan2025ctu,nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Joint optimization and end-to-end sampling}
|
||
\label{sec:method-joint}
|
||
We train the model in a staged manner consistent with the above factorization, which improves optimization stability and encourages each component to specialize in its intended role. Specifically: (i) we train the trend Transformer $f_{\phi}$ to obtain $\hat{\bm{S}}$; (ii) we compute residual targets $\hat{\bm{R}} = \bm{X} - \hat{\bm{S}}$ for the continuous variables routed to residual diffusion; (iii) we train the residual DDPM $p_{\theta}(\bm{R}\mid \hat{\bm{S}})$ and masked diffusion model $p_{\psi}(\bm{Y}\mid \text{masked}(\bm{Y}), \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}})$; and (iv) we apply type-aware routing and deterministic reconstruction during sampling. This staged strategy is aligned with the design goal of separating temporal scaffolding from distributional refinement, and it mirrors the broader intuition in time-series diffusion that decoupling coarse structure and stochastic detail can mitigate “structure vs. realism” conflicts \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
A simple combined objective is $\mathcal{L} = \lambda\mathcal{L}_{\text{cont}} + (1-\lambda)\mathcal{L}_{\text{disc}}$ with $\lambda\in[0,1]$ controlling the balance between continuous and discrete learning. Type-aware routing determines which channels contribute to which loss and which are excluded in favor of deterministic reconstruction. In practice, this routing acts as a principled guardrail against negative transfer across variable mechanisms: channels that are best handled deterministically (Type 5) or by specialized drivers (Type 1/3, depending on configuration) are prevented from forcing the diffusion models into statistically incoherent compromises.
|
||
|
||
At inference time, generation follows the same structured order: (i) trend $\hat{\bm{S}}$ via the Transformer, (ii) residual $\hat{\bm{R}}$ via DDPM, (iii) discrete $\hat{\bm{Y}}$ via masked diffusion, and (iv) type-aware assembly with deterministic reconstruction for routed variables. This pipeline produces $(\hat{\bm{X}},\hat{\bm{Y}})$ that are temporally coherent by construction (through $\hat{\bm{S}}$), distributionally expressive (through $\hat{\bm{R}}$ denoising), and discretely valid (through masked diffusion), while explicitly accounting for heterogeneous variable-generating mechanisms through type-aware routing. In combination, these choices constitute our central methodological contribution: a unified Transformer + mixed diffusion generator for ICS telemetry, augmented by typed factorization to align model capacity with domain mechanism \citep{ho2020denoising,shi2024simplified,yuan2025ctu,nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
% 4. Benchmark
|
||
\section{Benchmark}
|
||
\label{sec:benchmark}
|
||
A credible ICS generator must clear four progressively harder hurdles. It must first be \emph{semantically legal}: any out-of-vocabulary supervisory token renders a sample unusable, no matter how good its marginals look. It must then match the heterogeneous statistics of mixed-type telemetry, including continuous process channels and discrete supervisory states. Third, it must preserve \emph{mechanism-level realism}: switch-and-dwell behavior, bounded control motion, cross-tag coordination, and short-horizon persistence. Finally, these properties should matter downstream rather than only under offline similarity scores. We therefore organize the benchmark as a funnel rather than a flat metric list, moving from reproducibility and legality to diagnostic localization, extended realism, and ablation \citep{coletta2023constrained,yang2001interlock,stenger2024survey}.
|
||
|
||
This organization is particularly important for ICS telemetry. A generator can look competitive on one-dimensional marginals while still failing on the aspects that make a trace operationally plausible: long plateaus in setpoint-like variables, concentrated occupancy in actuator states, tight controller--sensor coupling, or persistent support signals. Our goal is therefore not to maximize a single scalar, but to show which parts of realism have already been solved, which remain brittle, and which model components are responsible for each regime.
|
||
|
||
For continuous channels, we measure marginal alignment with the Kolmogorov--Smirnov (KS) statistic per feature and average it over continuous variables. For discrete channels, we compute Jensen--Shannon divergence (JSD) between per-feature categorical marginals and average across discrete variables \citep{lin1991divergence,yoon2019timegan}. To assess short-horizon dynamics, we compare lag-1 autocorrelation feature-wise and report the mean absolute difference between real and synthetic lag-1 coefficients. We additionally track semantic legality by counting out-of-vocabulary discrete outputs, and we report a filtered KS that excludes near-constant channels whose variance is effectively zero. These core measures are complemented with type-aware diagnostics, extended realism metrics, and ablations.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Core fidelity, legality, and reproducibility}
|
||
\label{sec:benchmark-quant}
|
||
Across the three-run reproducibility sweep, Mask-DDPM achieves mean KS $=0.3311 \pm 0.0079$, mean JSD $=0.0284 \pm 0.0073$, and mean absolute lag-1 difference $=0.2684 \pm 0.0027$. The strongest individual seed reaches KS $=0.3224$, while the best runs for JSD and lag-1 are $0.0209$ and $0.2661$, respectively. Just as importantly, all three runs produce zero out-of-vocabulary tokens across the 26 modeled discrete channels, giving a validity rate of \textbf{100\%}. This is the first major benchmark takeaway: semantic legality is already saturated by construction, so the remaining difficulty is no longer ``can the model emit valid symbols?'' but rather ``can it place valid symbols and trajectories in the right temporal and cross-channel context?''
|
||
|
||
The latest fully diagnosed run provides the complementary view that a seed summary cannot offer. In that run, the model attains mean KS $=0.4025$, filtered mean KS $=0.3191$, mean JSD $=0.0166$, and mean absolute lag-1 difference $=0.2859$, again with zero invalid discrete tokens. Two points matter most. First, the discrete branch remains the most reliable component: low JSD combined with perfect validity means the generator is consistently learning legal supervisory semantics rather than merely matching coarse occupancy counts. Second, the sizable gap between overall KS and filtered KS shows that continuous mismatch is not spread uniformly across all channels. Instead, a relatively small subset of difficult variables dominates the error budget.
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig-benchmark-story-v2.png}
|
||
\caption{Benchmark evidence chain. Left: seed-level reproducibility over the three benchmark runs, showing that the global metrics are stable across seeds. Middle: top-10 continuous features ranked by KS in the latest fully diagnosed run, with overall and filtered average KS overlaid to show that a small subset of tags dominates the continuous error budget. Right: representative type-aware mismatch scores from the same run, using program dwell, controller change rate, actuator top-3 mass, PV tail ratio, and auxiliary lag-1 persistence as mechanism-level diagnostics. Lower is better in all panels.}
|
||
\label{fig:benchmark}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Main benchmark summary. The left column reports reproducibility across three complete runs; the right column reports the latest diagnosed run used for the per-feature, type-aware, and extended analyses. Lower is better except for validity rate.}
|
||
\label{tab:core_metrics}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Metric} & \textbf{3-run mean $\pm$ std} & \textbf{Latest diagnosed run} \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
Mean KS (continuous) & $0.3311 \pm 0.0079$ & $0.4025$ \\
|
||
Filtered mean KS & -- & $0.3191$ \\
|
||
Mean JSD (discrete) & $0.0284 \pm 0.0073$ & $0.0166$ \\
|
||
Mean abs. $\Delta$ lag-1 autocorr & $0.2684 \pm 0.0027$ & $0.2859$ \\
|
||
Validity rate (26 discrete tags) $\uparrow$ & $100.0 \pm 0.0\%$ & $100.0\%$ \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
|
||
Figure~\ref{fig:benchmark} turns these numbers into a diagnosis rather than a scoreboard. The largest KS contributors are concentrated in a handful of control-relevant tags, including \texttt{P1\_B4002}, \texttt{P1\_FCV02Z}, \texttt{P1\_B3004}, \texttt{P1\_B2004}, and \texttt{P1\_PCV02Z}. This means the current limitation is not a global collapse of the continuous generator. The model has already cleared the first hurdle (legality) and a large part of the second (mixed-type marginal fidelity). What remains difficult is the third hurdle: reproducing a small set of hard channels whose realism depends on step-like transitions, long plateaus, tightly bounded operating regions, or strong local persistence.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Extended realism and downstream utility}
|
||
\label{sec:benchmark-extended}
|
||
The next question is whether samples that look cleaner under fidelity metrics are also more structurally faithful and more useful. To probe this, we additionally evaluate two-sample distance, cross-variable coupling, spectral similarity, predictive consistency, memorization risk, and downstream anomaly-detection utility on the latest diagnosed run. Because this run contains only four synthetic windows (384 generated rows at $L=96$), we treat the resulting numbers as \emph{small-sample diagnostic evidence} rather than as the final word. They are still informative because they tell us which kinds of realism can be improved by post-processing and which ones cannot be repaired so easily.
|
||
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Extended realism and utility on the latest diagnosed run. The post-processed column corresponds to the typed post-processing baseline. Lower is better except for AUPRC. For reference, the real-only predictor RMSE is $0.558$ and the real-only anomaly AUPRC is $0.653$.}
|
||
\label{tab:extended_eval}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Metric} & \textbf{Raw generator} & \textbf{Post-processed} \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
Continuous MMD (RBF) & $0.6499$ & $0.2166$ \\
|
||
Discriminative accuracy (ideal $0.5$) & $1.0000$ & $0.5000$ \\
|
||
Mean abs. corr. diff. & $0.2134$ & $0.1909$ \\
|
||
Mean abs. lag-1 corr. diff. & $0.2132$ & $0.1989$ \\
|
||
PSD $L_1$ distance & $0.0195$ & $0.0224$ \\
|
||
Memorization ratio & $2.9515$ & $1.6205$ \\
|
||
Predictive RMSE (synthetic-only) & $0.9722$ & $0.9641$ \\
|
||
Predictive RMSE (real + synthetic) & $0.5433$ & $0.5413$ \\
|
||
Anomaly AUPRC (synthetic-only) & $0.5889$ & $0.5894$ \\
|
||
Anomaly AUPRC (real + synthetic) & $0.6449$ & $0.6476$ \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
|
||
Table~\ref{tab:extended_eval} reveals a useful asymmetry. Typed post-processing substantially improves distribution-level realism: continuous MMD drops from $0.6499$ to $0.2166$, discriminative accuracy moves from a trivially separable $1.0$ to the chance-level ideal of $0.5$, both contemporaneous and lagged correlation errors decrease, and the memorization ratio contracts from $2.95$ to $1.62$. In other words, post-processing is very effective at pulling the generated windows closer to the real holdout manifold without collapsing into exact training-set copies. Yet predictive and downstream utility improve only modestly. Synthetic-only predictors remain clearly weaker than real-only ones, and real-plus-synthetic anomaly utility stays slightly below the real-only baseline. This is an important benchmark result: once legality and low-order marginals are largely under control, the remaining gap is driven less by superficial distribution mismatch and more by mechanism-level dynamics that post hoc distribution shaping cannot fully restore.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Type-aware diagnostics}
|
||
\label{sec:benchmark-typed}
|
||
Type-aware diagnostics make that mechanism gap explicit. Table~\ref{tab:typed_diagnostics} summarizes one representative statistic per variable family, computed on the latest fully analyzed run. These statistics are not redundant with the main benchmark table. They answer a different question: \emph{if legality is already solved, what kind of control behavior is still implausible?}
|
||
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Type-aware diagnostic summary on the latest fully diagnosed run. ``Mean abs. error'' is reported in the native unit of the corresponding diagnostic statistic; ``Mean rel. error'' normalizes by the real-data value to indicate severity. Lower values indicate better alignment.}
|
||
\label{tab:typed_diagnostics}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}llcc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Type} & \textbf{Proxy statistic} & \textbf{Mean abs. error} & \textbf{Mean rel. error} \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
Program & mean dwell & $315.75$ & $0.64$ \\
|
||
Controller & change rate & $0.352$ & $0.84$ \\
|
||
Actuator & top-3 mass & $0.0117$ & $0.67$ \\
|
||
PV & tail ratio & $0.0796$ & $0.21$ \\
|
||
Auxiliary & lag-1 autocorr & $0.467$ & $0.77$ \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
|
||
This typed view sharpens the story substantially. Program-like channels remain the hardest class because the model still under-represents long dwell behavior: it switches too often instead of maintaining the long plateaus characteristic of setpoints and schedule-driven tags. Controllers are too reactive, as reflected in the large change-rate mismatch. Actuator channels are closer in aggregate but still spread probability mass too broadly, indicating that the generator does not yet reproduce the concentrated occupancy of a few valid operating states. PV diagnostics are the most encouraging: their tail-ratio error is materially smaller, suggesting that the continuous branch already captures a meaningful portion of process-variable shape even though some upper-tail behavior remains underfit. Auxiliary channels expose a different weakness, namely that support signals with strong short-horizon persistence are still not reproduced as faithfully as their low-order marginals. In short, legality is already solved, but control realism is not.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Ablation study}
|
||
\label{sec:benchmark-ablation}
|
||
A good ablation does more than show that removing components changes numbers; it should identify which failure mode each component is preventing. We therefore evaluate ten one-seed variants under the same pipeline and summarize six representative metrics: continuous fidelity (KS), discrete fidelity (JSD), short-horizon dynamics (lag-1), cross-variable coupling, predictive transfer, and downstream anomaly utility. Figure~\ref{fig:benchmark-ablations} visualizes signed changes relative to the full model, where red means that the ablated variant is worse. Table~\ref{tab:ablation} gives the underlying values.
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig-benchmark-ablations-v1.png}
|
||
\caption{Ablation impact relative to the full model. For KS, JSD, lag-1 error, coupling error, and predictive RMSE, positive values mean the ablated model is worse than the full model. For AUPRC, positive values mean the ablated model loses downstream utility. The figure makes clear that different components protect different notions of realism rather than contributing uniformly to every metric.}
|
||
\label{fig:benchmark-ablations}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\small
|
||
\caption{Ablation study on the latest one-seed runs. Lower is better except for anomaly AUPRC.}
|
||
\label{tab:ablation}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcccccc@{}}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
\textbf{Variant} & \textbf{KS$\downarrow$} & \textbf{JSD$\downarrow$} & \textbf{Lag-1$\downarrow$} & \textbf{Coupling$\downarrow$} & \textbf{Pred. RMSE$\downarrow$} & \textbf{AUPRC$\uparrow$} \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
\multicolumn{7}{@{}l}{\textit{Full model}} \\
|
||
Full model & $0.402$ & $0.028$ & $0.291$ & $0.215$ & $0.972$ & $0.644$ \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
\multicolumn{7}{@{}l}{\textit{Structure and conditioning}} \\
|
||
No temporal scaffold & $0.408$ & $0.031$ & $0.664$ & $0.306$ & $0.977$ & $0.645$ \\
|
||
No file condition & $0.405$ & $0.033$ & $0.237$ & $0.262$ & $0.986$ & $0.640$ \\
|
||
No type routing & $0.356$ & $0.022$ & $0.138$ & $0.324$ & $1.017$ & $0.647$ \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
\multicolumn{7}{@{}l}{\textit{Distribution shaping}} \\
|
||
No quantile transform & $0.599$ & $0.010$ & $0.156$ & $0.300$ & $1.653$ & $0.417$ \\
|
||
No post-calibration & $0.543$ & $0.024$ & $0.253$ & $0.249$ & $1.086$ & $0.647$ \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
\multicolumn{7}{@{}l}{\textit{Loss and target design}} \\
|
||
No SNR weighting & $0.400$ & $0.022$ & $0.299$ & $0.214$ & $0.961$ & $0.637$ \\
|
||
No quantile loss & $0.413$ & $0.018$ & $0.311$ & $0.213$ & $0.965$ & $0.645$ \\
|
||
No residual-stat loss & $0.404$ & $0.029$ & $0.285$ & $0.210$ & $0.970$ & $0.647$ \\
|
||
Epsilon target & $0.482$ & $0.102$ & $0.728$ & $0.195$ & $0.968$ & $0.647$ \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
|
||
The ablation results reveal three distinct roles. First, temporal staging is what makes the sequence look dynamical rather than merely plausible frame by frame: removing the temporal scaffold leaves KS nearly unchanged but more than doubles lag-1 error ($0.291 \rightarrow 0.664$) and substantially worsens coupling ($0.215 \rightarrow 0.306$). Second, quantile-based distribution shaping is what makes the continuous branch usable: without the quantile transform, KS degrades sharply ($0.402 \rightarrow 0.599$), synthetic-only predictive RMSE deteriorates dramatically ($0.972 \rightarrow 1.653$), and anomaly utility collapses ($0.644 \rightarrow 0.417$). This is not a cosmetic gain; it is one of the main contributors to usable process realism.
|
||
|
||
The routing ablation supplies the most instructive counterexample. Disabling type routing actually improves several one-dimensional metrics (for example KS and lag-1), yet it worsens coupling ($0.215 \rightarrow 0.324$) and predictive transfer ($0.972 \rightarrow 1.017$). This is exactly why the benchmark cannot stop at scalar per-feature scores: typed decomposition helps the generator coordinate variables and preserve mechanism-level consistency even when simpler metrics may look deceptively better without it. Finally, the target-parameterization ablation is the clearest failure case: replacing the current target with an epsilon target causes the largest degradation in JSD ($0.028 \rightarrow 0.102$) and lag-1 ($0.291 \rightarrow 0.728$), making it the most destructive ablation overall. By contrast, SNR weighting, quantile loss, and residual-stat regularization behave as second-order refinements whose effects are real but materially smaller.
|
||
|
||
Taken together, the benchmark now supports a sharper claim than a plain KS/JSD table could offer. Mask-DDPM already provides stable mixed-type fidelity, perfect discrete legality, and a meaningful amount of continuous realism. The remaining error is concentrated in a small subset of ICS-specific channels whose realism depends on rare switching, long dwell intervals, constrained occupancy, and persistent local dynamics. The ablation study clarifies why: temporal staging protects dynamical realism, quantile-based shaping protects continuous fidelity and downstream utility, and type-aware routing protects coordinated mechanism-level behavior even when simpler metrics do not fully reveal its value.
|
||
|
||
% 5. Future Work
|
||
\section{Future Work}
|
||
\label{sec:future}
|
||
Future work will further expand from "generating legal ICS feature sequences" to "data construction and adversarial evaluation for security tasks". The core contribution of this paper focuses on generating feature sequences that are temporally consistent, have credible distributions, and have legal discrete values under mixed types and multi-scale dynamics. However, in the actual research of intrusion detection and anomaly detection, the more critical bottleneck is often the lack of "illegal data/anomaly data" with clear attack semantics and sufficient coverage. Therefore, a direct and important extension direction is to use the legal sequences generated in this paper as a controllable and reproducible "base line operation flow", and then, on the premise of maintaining sequence-level legality and engineering constraints, inject or mix illegal behaviors according to specified attack patterns, thereby systematically constructing a dataset for training and evaluating the recognition of illegal data packets.
|
||
|
||
Specifically, attack injection can be upgraded from "simple perturbation" to "semantically consistent patterned rewriting": on continuous channels, implement bias injection, covert manipulation near thresholds, instantaneous mutations, and intermittent bursts, etc., so that it can both mimic the temporal characteristics pursued by attackers for concealment and not violate the basic boundary conditions of process dynamics; on discrete channels, implement illegal state transitions, alarm suppression/delayed triggering, pattern camouflage, etc., so that it reflects the trajectory morphology of "unreachable but forcibly created" under real control logic. Furthermore, the attack injection process itself can be coordinated with the type routing and constraint layer in this paper: for deterministically derived variables, illegal behaviors should be transmitted through the modification of upstream variables to maintain consistency; for supervised variables constrained by finite-state machines, interpretable illegal transitions should be generated through the "minimum violation path" or "controlled violation intensity", and violation points and violation types should be explicitly marked to facilitate downstream detection tasks to learn more fine-grained discrimination criteria.
|
||
|
||
In terms of method morphology, this direction also naturally supports stronger controllability and measurability: attack patterns can be regarded as conditional variables to uniformly conditionally orchestrate legitimate generation and illegal injection, generating control samples of "different attack strategies under the same legitimate framework", thereby transforming dataset construction into a repeatable scenario generation process; meanwhile, by controlling the injection location, duration, amplitude, and coupling range, the performance degradation curves of detectors under different threat intensities and different operating condition stages can be systematically scanned, forming a more stable benchmark than "single acquisition/single script". Ultimately, this approach will transform the legitimate data generation capabilities presented in this paper into the infrastructure for security research: first providing a shareable and reproducible legitimate operation distribution, then injecting illegal patterns with clear semantics in a controllable manner, producing a dataset with sufficient coverage and consistent annotation for training and evaluating models that identify illegal packets/abnormal sequences, and promoting the improvement of reproducibility and engineering credibility in this direction.
|
||
|
||
% 6. Conclusion
|
||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
||
This paper addresses the data scarcity and shareability barriers that limit machine-learning research for industrial control system (ICS) security by proposing a practical synthetic telemetry generation framework at the protocol feature level. We introduced Mask-DDPM, a hybrid generator designed explicitly for the mixed-type and multi-scale nature of ICS data, where continuous process dynamics must remain temporally coherent while discrete supervisory variables must remain categorically legal by construction.
|
||
|
||
Our main contributions are: (i) a causal Transformer trend module that provides a stable long-horizon temporal scaffold for continuous channels; (ii) a trend-conditioned residual DDPM that focuses modeling capacity on local stochastic detail and marginal fidelity without destabilizing global structure; (iii) a masked (absorbing) diffusion branch for discrete variables that guarantees in-vocabulary outputs and supports semantics-aware conditioning on continuous context; and (iv) a type-aware decomposition/routing layer that aligns model mechanisms with heterogeneous ICS variable origins (e.g., process inertia, step-and-dwell setpoints, deterministic derived tags), enabling deterministic enforcement where appropriate and improving capacity allocation.
|
||
|
||
We evaluated the approach on windows derived from the HAI Security Dataset and reported mixed-type, protocol-relevant metrics rather than a single aggregate score. Across seeds, the model achieves stable fidelity with mean KS = 0.3311 ± 0.0079 on continuous features, mean JSD = 0.0284 ± 0.0073 on discrete features, and mean absolute lag-1 autocorrelation difference 0.2684 ± 0.0027, indicating that Mask-DDPM preserves both marginal distributions and short-horizon dynamics while maintaining discrete legality.
|
||
|
||
Overall, Mask-DDPM provides a reproducible foundation for generating shareable, semantically valid ICS feature sequences suitable for data augmentation, benchmarking, and downstream packet/trace reconstruction workflows. Building on this capability, a natural next step is to move from purely legal synthesis toward controllable scenario construction, including structured attack/violation injection under engineering constraints to support adversarial evaluation and more comprehensive security benchmarks.
|
||
% 参考文献
|
||
\bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}
|
||
\bibliography{references}
|
||
|
||
\end{document}
|