forked from manbo/internal-docs
256 lines
31 KiB
TeX
256 lines
31 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{article}
|
||
|
||
\usepackage{arxiv}
|
||
|
||
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % allow utf-8 input
|
||
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % use 8-bit T1 fonts
|
||
\usepackage{hyperref} % hyperlinks
|
||
\usepackage{url} % simple URL typesetting
|
||
\usepackage{booktabs} % professional-quality tables
|
||
\usepackage{amsfonts} % blackboard math symbols
|
||
\usepackage{nicefrac} % compact symbols for 1/2, etc.
|
||
\usepackage{microtype} % microtypography
|
||
\usepackage{cleveref} % smart cross-referencing
|
||
\usepackage{lipsum} % Can be removed after putting your text content
|
||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||
\usepackage{natbib}
|
||
\usepackage{doi}
|
||
|
||
% Packages for equations
|
||
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
||
\usepackage{bm}
|
||
|
||
% 标题
|
||
\title{Your Paper Title: A Deep Learning Approach for Something}
|
||
|
||
% 若不需要日期，取消下面一行的注释
|
||
%\date{}
|
||
|
||
\newif\ifuniqueAffiliation
|
||
\uniqueAffiliationtrue
|
||
|
||
\ifuniqueAffiliation % 标准作者块
|
||
\author{
|
||
David S.~Hippocampus \\
|
||
Department of Computer Science\\
|
||
Cranberry-Lemon University\\
|
||
Pittsburgh, PA 15213 \\
|
||
\texttt{hippo@cs.cranberry-lemon.edu} \\
|
||
\And
|
||
Elias D.~Striatum \\
|
||
Department of Electrical Engineering\\
|
||
Mount-Sheikh University\\
|
||
Santa Narimana, Levand \\
|
||
\texttt{stariate@ee.mount-sheikh.edu} \\
|
||
\And
|
||
John Q.~Doe \\
|
||
Department of Mathematics\\
|
||
University of California, Berkeley\\
|
||
Berkeley, CA 94720 \\
|
||
\texttt{johndoe@math.berkeley.edu}
|
||
}
|
||
\fi
|
||
|
||
% 页眉设置
|
||
\renewcommand{\shorttitle}{\textit{arXiv} Template}
|
||
|
||
%%% PDF 元数据
|
||
\hypersetup{
|
||
pdftitle={Your Paper Title},
|
||
pdfsubject={cs.LG, cs.CR},
|
||
pdfauthor={David S.~Hippocampus, Elias D.~Striatum},
|
||
pdfkeywords={Keyword1, Keyword2, Keyword3},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
\begin{document}
|
||
\maketitle
|
||
|
||
\begin{abstract}
|
||
Here is the abstract of your paper.
|
||
\end{abstract}
|
||
|
||
% 关键词
|
||
\keywords{Machine Learning \and Cyber Defense \and Benchmark \and Methodology}
|
||
|
||
% 1. Introduction
|
||
\section{Introduction}
|
||
\label{sec:intro}
|
||
Here introduces the background, problem statement, and contribution.
|
||
|
||
% 2. Related Work
|
||
\section{Related Work}
|
||
\label{sec:related}
|
||
Early generation of network data oriented towards ``realism'' mostly remained at the packet/flow header level, either through replay or statistical synthesis based on single-point observations. Swing, in a closed-loop, network-responsive manner, extracts user/application/network distributions from single-point observations to reproduce burstiness and correlation across multiple time scales \citep{10.1145/1151659.1159928,10.1145/1159913.1159928}. Subsequently, a series of works advanced header synthesis to learning-based generation: the WGAN-based method added explicit verification of protocol field consistency to NetFlow/IPFIX \citep{Ring_2019}, NetShare reconstructed header modeling as flow-level time series and improved fidelity and scalability through domain encoding and parallel fine-tuning \citep{10.1145/3544216.3544251}, and DoppelGANger preserved the long-range structure and downstream sorting consistency of networked time series by decoupling attributes from sequences \citep{Lin_2020}. However, in industrial control system (ICS) scenarios, the original PCAP is usually not shareable, and public testbeds (such as SWaT, WADI) mostly provide process/monitoring telemetry and protocol interactions for security assessment, but public datasets emphasize operational variables rather than packet-level traces \citep{7469060,10.1145/3055366.3055375}. This makes ``synthesis at the feature/telemetry level, aware of protocol and semantics'' more feasible and necessary in practice: we are more concerned with reproducing high-level distributions and multi-scale temporal patterns according to operational semantics and physical constraints without relying on the original packets. From this perspective, the generation paradigm naturally shifts from ``packet syntax reproduction'' to ``modeling of high-level spatio-temporal distributions and uncertainties'', requiring stable training, strong distribution fitting, and interpretable uncertainty characterization.
|
||
|
||
Diffusion models exhibit good fit along this path: DDPM achieves high-quality sampling and stable optimization through efficient $\epsilon$ parameterization and weighted variational objectives \citep{NEURIPS2020_4c5bcfec}, the SDE perspective unifies score-based and diffusion, providing likelihood evaluation and prediction-correction sampling strategies based on probability flow ODEs \citep{song2021scorebasedgenerativemodelingstochastic}. For time series, TimeGrad replaces the constrained output distribution with conditional denoising, capturing high-dimensional correlations at each step \citep{rasul2021autoregressivedenoisingdiffusionmodels}; CSDI explicitly performs conditional diffusion and uses two-dimensional attention to simultaneously leverage temporal and cross-feature dependencies, suitable for conditioning and filling in missing values \citep{tashiro2021csdiconditionalscorebaseddiffusion}; in a more general spatio-temporal structure, DiffSTG generalizes diffusion to spatio-temporal graphs, combining TCN/GCN with denoising U-Net to improve CRPS and inference efficiency in a non-autoregressive manner \citep{wen2024diffstgprobabilisticspatiotemporalgraph}, and PriSTI further enhances conditional features and geographical relationships, maintaining robustness under high missing rates and sensor failures \citep{liu2023pristiconditionaldiffusionframework}; in long sequences and continuous domains, DiffWave verifies that diffusion can also match the quality of strong vocoders under non-autoregressive fast synthesis \citep{kong2021diffwaveversatilediffusionmodel}; studies on cellular communication traffic show that diffusion can recover spatio-temporal patterns and provide uncertainty characterization at the urban scale \citep{11087622}. These results overall point to a conclusion: when the research focus is on ``telemetry/high-level features'' rather than raw messages, diffusion models provide stable and fine-grained distribution fitting and uncertainty quantification, which is exactly in line with the requirements of ICS telemetry synthesis. Meanwhile, directly entrusting all structures to a ``monolithic diffusion'' is not advisable: long-range temporal skeletons and fine-grained marginal distributions often have optimization tensions, requiring explicit decoupling in modeling.
|
||
|
||
Looking further into the mechanism complexity of ICS: its channel types are inherently mixed, containing both continuous process trajectories and discrete supervision/status variables, and discrete channels must be ``legal'' under operational constraints. The aforementioned progress in time series diffusion has mainly occurred in continuous spaces, but discrete diffusion has also developed systematic methods: D3PM improves sampling quality and likelihood through absorption/masking and structured transitions in discrete state spaces \citep{austin2023structureddenoisingdiffusionmodels}, subsequent masked diffusion provides stable reconstruction on categorical data in a more simplified form \citep{Lin_2020}, multinomial diffusion directly defines diffusion on a finite vocabulary through mechanisms such as argmax flows \citep{hoogeboom2021argmaxflowsmultinomialdiffusion}, and Diffusion-LM demonstrates an effective path for controllable text generation by imposing gradient constraints in continuous latent spaces \citep{li2022diffusionlmimprovescontrollabletext}. From the perspectives of protocols and finite-state machines, coverage-guided fuzz testing emphasizes the criticality of ``sequence legality and state coverage'' \citep{meng2025aflnetyearslatercoverageguided,godefroid2017learnfuzzmachinelearninginput,she2019neuzzefficientfuzzingneural}, echoing the concept of ``legality by construction'' in discrete diffusion: preferentially adopting absorption/masking diffusion on discrete channels, supplemented by type-aware conditioning and sampling constraints, to avoid semantic invalidity and marginal distortion caused by post hoc thresholding.
|
||
|
||
From the perspective of high-level synthesis, the temporal structure is equally indispensable: ICS control often involves delay effects, phased operating conditions, and cross-channel coupling, requiring models to be able to characterize low-frequency, long-range dependencies while also overlaying multi-modal fine-grained fluctuations on them. The Transformer series has provided sufficient evidence in long-sequence time series tasks: Transformer-XL breaks through the fixed-length context limitation through a reusable memory mechanism and significantly enhances long-range dependency expression \citep{dai2019transformerxlattentivelanguagemodels}; Informer uses ProbSparse attention and efficient decoding to balance span and efficiency in long-sequence prediction \citep{zhou2021informerefficienttransformerlong}; Autoformer robustly models long-term seasonality and trends through autocorrelation and decomposition mechanisms \citep{wu2022autoformerdecompositiontransformersautocorrelation}; FEDformer further improves long-period prediction performance in frequency domain enhancement and decomposition \citep{zhou2022fedformerfrequencyenhanceddecomposed}; PatchTST enhances the stability and generalization of long-sequence multivariate prediction through local patch-based representation and channel-independent modeling \citep{2023}. Combining our previous positioning of diffusion, this chain of evidence points to a natural division of labor: using attention-based sequence models to first extract stable low-frequency trends/conditions (long-range skeletons), and then allowing diffusion to focus on margins and details in the residual space; meanwhile, discrete masking/absorbing diffusion is applied to supervised/pattern variables to ensure vocabulary legality by construction. This design not only inherits the advantages of time series diffusion in distribution fitting and uncertainty characterization \citep{rasul2021autoregressivedenoisingdiffusionmodels,tashiro2021csdiconditionalscorebaseddiffusion,wen2024diffstgprobabilisticspatiotemporalgraph,liu2023pristiconditionaldiffusionframework,kong2021diffwaveversatilediffusionmodel,11087622}, but also stabilizes the macroscopic temporal support through the long-range attention of Transformer, enabling the formation of an operational integrated generation pipeline under the mixed types and multi-scale dynamics of ICS.
|
||
|
||
% 3. Methodology
|
||
\section{Methodology}
|
||
\label{sec:method}
|
||
Industrial control system (ICS) telemetry is intrinsically mixed-type and mechanistically heterogeneous: continuous process trajectories (e.g., sensor and actuator signals) coexist with discrete supervisory states (e.g., modes, alarms, interlocks), and the underlying generating mechanisms range from physical inertia to program-driven step logic. This heterogeneity is not cosmetic—it directly affects what “realistic” synthesis means, because a generator must jointly satisfy (i) temporal coherence, (ii) distributional fidelity, and (iii) discrete semantic validity (i.e., every discrete output must belong to its legal vocabulary by construction). These properties are emphasized broadly in operational-technology security guidance and ICS engineering practice, where state logic and physical dynamics are tightly coupled \citep{nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
We formalize each training instance as a fixed-length window of length We model each training instance as a fixed-length window of length $L$, comprising continuous channels $\bm{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times d_c}$ and discrete channels $\bm{Y} = \{y^{(j)}_{1:L}\}_{j=1}^{d_d}$, where each discrete variable satisfies $y^{(j)}_t \in \mathcal{V}_j$ for a finite vocabulary $\mathcal{V}_j$. Our objective is to learn a generator that produces synthetic $(\hat{\bm{X}}, \hat{\bm{Y}})$ that are simultaneously coherent and distributionally faithful, while also ensuring $\hat{y}^{(j)}_t\in\mathcal{V}_j$ for all $j$, $t$ by construction (rather than via post-hoc rounding or thresholding).
|
||
|
||
A key empirical and methodological tension in ICS synthesis is that temporal realism and marginal/distributional realism can compete when optimized monolithically: sequence models trained primarily for regression often over-smooth heavy tails and intermittent bursts, while purely distribution-matching objectives can erode long-range structure. Diffusion models provide a principled route to rich distribution modeling through iterative denoising, but they do not, by themselves, resolve (i) the need for a stable low-frequency temporal scaffold, nor (ii) the discrete legality constraints for supervisory variables \citep{ho2020denoising,song2021score}. Recent time-series diffusion work further suggests that separating coarse structure from stochastic refinement can be an effective inductive bias for long-horizon realism \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{fig-design-v2.png}
|
||
% \caption{Description of the figure.}
|
||
\label{fig:design}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
Motivated by these considerations, we propose Mask-DDPM, organized in the following order:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Transformer trend module: learns the dominant temporal backbone of continuous dynamics via attention-based sequence modeling \citep{vaswani2017attention}.
|
||
|
||
\item Residual DDPM for continuous variables: models distributional detail as stochastic residual structure conditioned on the learned trend \citep{ho2020denoising,kollovieh2023tsdiff}.
|
||
|
||
\item Masked diffusion for discrete variables: generates discrete ICS states with an absorbing/masking corruption process and categorical reconstruction \citep{austin2021structured, shi2024simplified}.
|
||
|
||
\item Type-aware decomposition: a type-aware factorization and routing layer that assigns variables to the most appropriate modeling mechanism and enforces deterministic constraints where warranted.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
|
||
This ordering is intentional. The trend module establishes a macro-temporal scaffold; residual diffusion then concentrates capacity on micro-structure and marginal fidelity; masked diffusion provides a native mechanism for discrete legality; and the type-aware layer operationalizes the observation that not all ICS variables should be modeled with the same stochastic mechanism. Importantly, while diffusion-based generation for ICS telemetry has begun to emerge, existing approaches remain limited and typically emphasize continuous synthesis or augmentation; in contrast, our pipeline integrates (i) a Transformer-conditioned residual diffusion backbone, (ii) a discrete masked-diffusion branch, and (iii) explicit type-aware routing for heterogeneous variable mechanisms within a single coherent generator \citep{yuan2025ctu,sha2026ddpm}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Transformer trend module for continuous dynamics}
|
||
\label{sec:method-trans}
|
||
We instantiate the temporal backbone as a causal Transformer trend extractor, leveraging self-attention’s ability to represent long-range dependencies and cross-channel interactions without recurrence \citep{vaswani2017attention}. Compared with recurrent trend extractors (e.g., GRU-style backbones), a Transformer trend module offers a direct mechanism to model delayed effects and multivariate coupling—common in ICS, where control actions may influence downstream sensors with nontrivial lags and regime-dependent propagation \citep{vaswani2017attention,nist2023sp80082}. Crucially, in our design the Transformer is not asked to be the entire generator; instead, it serves a deliberately restricted role: providing a stable, temporally coherent conditioning signal that later stochastic components refine.
|
||
|
||
For continuous channels $\bm{X}$, we posit an additive decomposition:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\bm{X} = \bm{S} + \bm{R},
|
||
\label{eq:additive_decomp}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\bm{S} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times d_c}$ is a smooth trend capturing predictable temporal evolution, and $\bm{R} \in \mathbb{R}^{L \times d_c}$ is a residual capturing distributional detail (e.g., bursts, heavy tails, local fluctuations) that is difficult to represent robustly with a purely regression-based temporal objective. This separation reflects an explicit division of labor: the trend module prioritizes temporal coherence, while diffusion (introduced next) targets distributional realism at the residual level—a strategy aligned with “predict-then-refine” perspectives in time-series diffusion modeling \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
We parameterize the trend $\bm{S}$ using a causal Transformer $f_\phi$. With teacher forcing, we train $F_\phi$ to predict the next-step trend from past observations:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\hat{\bm{S}}_{t+1} = f_{\phi}(\bm{X}_{1:t}), \quad t = 1, \dots, L-1.
|
||
\label{eq:trend_prediction}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
using the mean-squared error objective:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}_{\text{trend}}(\phi) = \frac{1}{(L-1)d_c} \sum_{t=1}^{L-1} \bigl\| \hat{\bm{S}}_{t+1} - \bm{X}_{t+1} \bigr\|_2^2.
|
||
\label{eq:trend_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
At inference, we roll out the Transformer autoregressively to obtain $\hat{\bm{S}}$, and and then define the residual target for diffusion as $\bm{R} = \bm{X} - \hat{\bm{S}}$. This setup intentionally “locks in” a coherent low-frequency scaffold before any stochastic refinement is applied, thereby reducing the burden on downstream diffusion modules to simultaneously learn both long-range structure and marginal detail. In this sense, our use of Transformers is distinctive: it is a conditioning-first temporal backbone designed to stabilize mixed-type diffusion synthesis in ICS, rather than an end-to-end monolithic generator \citep{vaswani2017attention,kollovieh2023tsdiff,yuan2025ctu}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{DDPM for continuous residual generation}
|
||
\label{sec:method-ddpm}
|
||
We model the residual RRR with a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) conditioned on the trend $\hat{\bm{S}}$ \citep{ho2020denoising}. Diffusion models learn complex data distributions by inverting a tractable noising process through iterative denoising, and have proven effective at capturing multimodality and heavy-tailed structure that is often attenuated by purely regression-based sequence models \citep{ho2020denoising,song2021score}. Conditioning the diffusion model on $\hat{\bm{S}}$ is central: it prevents the denoiser from re-learning the low-frequency scaffold and focuses capacity on residual micro-structure, mirroring the broader principle that diffusion excels as a distributional corrector when a reasonable coarse structure is available \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff, sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
Let $\bm{K}$ denote the number of diffusion steps, with a noise schedule $\{\beta_k\}_{k=1}^K$, $\alpha_k = 1 - \beta_k$, and $\bar{\alpha}_k = \prod_{i=1}^k \alpha_i$. The forward corruption process is:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
q(\bm{r}_k \mid \bm{r}_0) &= \mathcal{N}\bigl( \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_k}\,\bm{r}_0,\; (1 - \bar{\alpha}_k)\mathbf{I} \bigr)
|
||
\label{eq:forward_corruption}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
equivalently,
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\bm{r}_k &= \sqrt{\bar{\alpha}_k}\,\bm{r}_0 + \sqrt{1 - \bar{\alpha}_k}\,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}, \quad \boldsymbol{\epsilon} \sim \mathcal{N}(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{I})
|
||
\label{eq:forward_corruption_eq}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
The learned reverse process is parameterized as:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
p_{\theta}(\bm{r}_{k-1} \mid \bm{r}_k, \hat{\bm{S}}) = \mathcal{N}\bigl( \boldsymbol{\mu}_{\theta}(\bm{r}_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}),\; \boldsymbol{\Sigma}(k) \bigr).
|
||
\label{eq:reverse_process}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\mu_\theta$ is implemented by a Transformer denoiser that consumes (i) the noised residual $r_k$, (ii) a timestep embedding for $k$, and (iii) conditioning features derived from $\hat{\bm{S}}$. This denoiser architecture is consistent with the growing use of attention-based denoisers for long-context time-series diffusion, while our key methodological emphasis is the trend-conditioned residual factorization as the object of diffusion learning \citep{ho2020denoising,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
We train the denoiser using the standard DDPM $\epsilon$-prediction objective:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}_{\text{cont}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_{k,\bm{r}_0,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}} \left[ \bigl\| \boldsymbol{\epsilon} - \boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{\theta}(\bm{r}_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}) \bigr\|_2^2 \right].
|
||
\label{eq:ddpm_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
Because diffusion optimization can exhibit timestep imbalance (i.e., some timesteps dominate gradients), we optionally apply an SNR-based reweighting consistent with Min-SNR training:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}^{\text{snr}}_{\text{cont}}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_{k,\bm{r}_0,\boldsymbol{\epsilon}} \left[ w_k \bigl\| \boldsymbol{\epsilon} - \boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{\theta}(\bm{r}_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}) \bigr\|_2^2 \right],
|
||
\label{eq:snr_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\mathrm{SNR}_k=\bar{\alpha}_k/(1-\bar{\alpha}_k)$ and $\gamma>0$ is a cap parameter \citep{hang2023efficient}.
|
||
|
||
After sampling $\hat{\bm{R}}$ by reverse diffusion, we reconstruct the continuous output as $\hat{\bm{X}} = \hat{\bm{S}} + \hat{\bm{R}}$. Overall, the DDPM component serves as a distributional corrector on top of a temporally coherent backbone, which is particularly suited to ICS where low-frequency dynamics are strong and persistent but fine-scale variability (including bursts and regime-conditioned noise) remains important for realism. Relative to prior ICS diffusion efforts that primarily focus on continuous augmentation, our formulation elevates trend-conditioned residual diffusion as a modular mechanism for disentangling temporal structure from distributional refinement \citep{yuan2025ctu,sha2026ddpm}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Masked diffusion for discrete ICS variables}
|
||
\label{sec:method-discrete}
|
||
Discrete ICS variables must remain categorical, making Gaussian diffusion inappropriate for supervisory states and mode-like channels. While one can attempt continuous relaxations or post-hoc discretization, such strategies risk producing semantically invalid intermediate states (e.g., “in-between” modes) and can distort the discrete marginal distribution. Discrete-state diffusion provides a principled alternative by defining a valid corruption process directly on categorical variables \citep{austin2021structured,shi2024simplified}. In the ICS setting, this is not a secondary detail: supervisory tags often encode control logic boundaries (modes, alarms, interlocks) that must remain within a finite vocabulary to preserve semantic correctness \citep{nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
We therefore adopt masked (absorbing) diffusion for discrete channels, where corruption replaces tokens with a special $\texttt{[MASK]}$ symbol according to a schedule \citep{shi2024simplified}. For each variable $j$, define a masking schedule $\{m_k\}_{k=1}^K$ (with $m_k\in[0,1]$) increasing in $k$. The forward corruption process is:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
q(y^{(j)}_k \mid y^{(j)}_0)=
|
||
\begin{cases}
|
||
y^{(j)}, & \text{with probability } 1-m_k,\\
|
||
\texttt{[MASK]}, & \text{with probability } m_k,
|
||
\end{cases}
|
||
\label{eq:masking_process}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
applied independently across $j$ and $t$. Let $\mathcal{M}$ denote the set of masked positions at step $k$. The denoiser $h_{\psi}$ predicts a categorical distribution over $\mathcal{V}_j$ for each masked token, conditioned on (i) the corrupted discrete sequence, (ii) the diffusion step $k$, and (iii) continuous context. Concretely, we condition on $\hat{\bm{S}}$ and $\hat{\bm{X}}$ to couple supervisory reconstruction to the underlying continuous dynamics:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
p_{\psi}\bigl( y^{(j)}_0 \mid y_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}} \bigr) = h_{\psi}(y_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}}).
|
||
\label{eq:discrete_denoising}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
This conditioning choice is motivated by the fact that many discrete ICS states are not standalone, they are functions of regimes, thresholds, and procedural phases that manifest in continuous channels \citep{nist2023sp80082}. Training uses a categorical denoising objective:
|
||
\begin{equation}
|
||
\mathcal{L}_{\text{disc}}(\psi) = \mathbb{E}_{k} \left[ \frac{1}{|\mathcal{M}|} \sum_{(j,t) \in \mathcal{M}} \mathrm{CE}\bigl( h_{\psi}(y_k, k, \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}})_{j,t},\; y^{(j)}_{0,t} \bigr) \right],
|
||
\label{eq:discrete_loss}
|
||
\end{equation}
|
||
where $\mathrm{CE}(\cdot,\cdot)$ is cross-entropy. At sampling time, we initialize all discrete tokens as $\texttt{[MASK]}$ and iteratively unmask them using the learned conditionals, ensuring that every output token lies in its legal vocabulary by construction. This discrete branch is a key differentiator of our pipeline: unlike typical continuous-only diffusion augmentation in ICS, we integrate masked diffusion as a first-class mechanism for supervisory-variable legality within the same end-to-end synthesis workflow \citep{shi2024simplified,yuan2025ctu}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Type-aware decomposition as factorization and routing layer}
|
||
\label{sec:method-types}
|
||
Even with a trend-conditioned residual DDPM and a discrete masked-diffusion branch, a single uniform modeling treatment can remain suboptimal because ICS variables are generated by qualitatively different mechanisms. For example, program-driven setpoints exhibit step-and-dwell dynamics; controller outputs follow control laws conditioned on process feedback; actuator positions may show saturation and dwell; and some “derived tags” are deterministic functions of other channels. Treating all channels as if they were exchangeable stochastic processes can misallocate model capacity and induce systematic error concentration on a small subset of mechanistically distinct variables \citep{nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
We therefore introduce a type-aware decomposition that formalizes this heterogeneity as a routing and constraint layer. Let $\tau(i)\in{1,\dots,6}$ assign each variable (i) to a type class. The type assignment can be initialized from domain semantics (tag metadata, value domains, and engineering meaning), and subsequently refined via an error-attribution workflow described in the Benchmark section. Importantly, this refinement does not change the core diffusion backbone; it changes which mechanism is responsible for which variable, thereby aligning inductive bias with variable-generating mechanism while preserving overall coherence.
|
||
|
||
We use the following taxonomy:
|
||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||
\item Type 1 (program-driven / setpoint-like): externally commanded, step-and-dwell variables. These variables can be treated as exogenous drivers (conditioning signals) or routed to specialized change-point / dwell-time models, rather than being forced into a smooth denoiser that may over-regularize step structure.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 2 (controller outputs): continuous variables tightly coupled to feedback loops; these benefit from conditional modeling where the conditioning includes relevant process variables and commanded setpoints.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 3 (actuator states/positions): often exhibit saturation, dwell, and rate limits; these may require stateful dynamics beyond generic residual diffusion, motivating either specialized conditional modules or additional inductive constraints.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 4 (process variables): inertia-dominated continuous dynamics; these are the primary beneficiaries of the Transformer trend + residual DDPM pipeline.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 5 (derived/deterministic variables): algebraic or rule-based functions of other variables; we enforce deterministic reconstruction $\hat{x}^{(i)} = g_i(\hat{X},\hat{Y})$ rather than learning a stochastic generator, improving logical consistency and sample efficiency.
|
||
|
||
\item Type 6 (auxiliary/low-impact variables): weakly coupled or sparse signals; we allow simplified modeling (e.g., calibrated marginals or lightweight temporal models) to avoid allocating diffusion capacity where it is not warranted.
|
||
\end{enumerate}
|
||
|
||
Type-aware decomposition improves synthesis quality through three mechanisms. First, it improves capacity allocation by preventing a small set of mechanistically atypical variables from dominating gradients and distorting the learned distribution for the majority class (typically Type 4). Second, it enables constraint enforcement by deterministically reconstructing Type 5 variables, preventing logically inconsistent samples that purely learned generators can produce. Third, it improves mechanism alignment by attaching inductive biases consistent with step/dwell or saturation behaviors where generic denoisers may implicitly favor smoothness.
|
||
|
||
From a novelty standpoint, this layer is not merely an engineering “patch”; it is an explicit methodological statement that ICS synthesis benefits from typed factorization—a principle that has analogues in mixed-type generative modeling more broadly, but that remains underexplored in diffusion-based ICS telemetry synthesis \citep{shi2025tabdiff,yuan2025ctu,nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Joint optimization and end-to-end sampling}
|
||
\label{sec:method-joint}
|
||
We train the model in a staged manner consistent with the above factorization, which improves optimization stability and encourages each component to specialize in its intended role. Specifically: (i) we train the trend Transformer $f_{\phi}$ to obtain $\hat{\bm{S}}$; (ii) we compute residual targets $\hat{\bm{R}} = \bm{X} - \hat{\bm{S}}$ for the continuous variables routed to residual diffusion; (iii) we train the residual DDPM $p_{\theta}(\bm{R}\mid \hat{\bm{S}})$ and masked diffusion model $p_{\psi}(\bm{Y}\mid \text{masked}(\bm{Y}), \hat{\bm{S}}, \hat{\bm{X}})$; and (iv) we apply type-aware routing and deterministic reconstruction during sampling. This staged strategy is aligned with the design goal of separating temporal scaffolding from distributional refinement, and it mirrors the broader intuition in time-series diffusion that decoupling coarse structure and stochastic detail can mitigate “structure vs. realism” conflicts \citep{kollovieh2023tsdiff,sikder2023transfusion}.
|
||
|
||
A simple combined objective is $\mathcal{L} = \lambda\mathcal{L}_{\text{cont}} + (1-\lambda)\mathcal{L}_{\text{disc}}$ with $\lambda\in[0,1]$ controlling the balance between continuous and discrete learning. Type-aware routing determines which channels contribute to which loss and which are excluded in favor of deterministic reconstruction. In practice, this routing acts as a principled guardrail against negative transfer across variable mechanisms: channels that are best handled deterministically (Type 5) or by specialized drivers (Type 1/3, depending on configuration) are prevented from forcing the diffusion models into statistically incoherent compromises.
|
||
|
||
At inference time, generation follows the same structured order: (i) trend $\hat{\bm{S}}$ via the Transformer, (ii) residual $\hat{\bm{R}}$ via DDPM, (iii) discrete $\hat{\bm{Y}}$ via masked diffusion, and (iv) type-aware assembly with deterministic reconstruction for routed variables. This pipeline produces $(\hat{\bm{X}},\hat{\bm{Y}})$ that are temporally coherent by construction (through $\hat{\bm{S}}$), distributionally expressive (through $\hat{\bm{R}}$ denoising), and discretely valid (through masked diffusion), while explicitly accounting for heterogeneous variable-generating mechanisms through type-aware routing. In combination, these choices constitute our central methodological contribution: a unified Transformer + mixed diffusion generator for ICS telemetry, augmented by typed factorization to align model capacity with domain mechanism \citep{ho2020denoising,shi2024simplified,yuan2025ctu,nist2023sp80082}.
|
||
|
||
% 4. Benchmark
|
||
\section{Benchmark}
|
||
\label{sec:benchmark}
|
||
In this section, we present the experimental setup and results.
|
||
|
||
% 5. Future Work
|
||
\section{Future Work}
|
||
\label{sec:future}
|
||
In this section, we present the future work.
|
||
|
||
% 6. Conclusion
|
||
\section{Conclusion}
|
||
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
||
In this section, we summarize our contributions and future directions.
|
||
|
||
% 参考文献
|
||
\bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}
|
||
\bibliography{references}
|
||
|
||
\end{document}
|